The domino effect: How small changes can undermine Active Directory security and enterprise resilience

Nearly 80% of enterprise cyberattacks exploit Active Directory for privilege escalation and lateral movement. What’s more, attackers often persist within Active Directory environments for months or even years before being detected.

Seemingly minor changes in Active Directory, such as adjusting password policies, altering group memberships, or changing GPO settings, can have outsized consequences for enterprise security. What may appear as harmless tweaks can open unforeseen entry points for attackers, weaken resilience, and disrupt the broader security posture. To address this, organizations need to view every configuration change as part of their larger security strategy, ensuring the right teams are involved, the right tools are in place, and every adjustment is made with security and continuity in mind.

What are some Active Directory security challenges?

The following are some security challenges Active Directory poses:

• Growing Active Directory vulnerabilities: Years of unchecked modifications create vulnerabilities such as orphaned accounts, privilege creep, and risky GPOs that attackers can easily exploit.
• Invisible risks in daily operations: Without continuous monitoring, subtle misconfigurations slip past IT teams, leaving enterprises blind to stealthy Active Directory attacks until the damage is widespread.
• Challenges in securing Active Directory at scale: Hybrid environments, cloud syncs, and third-party integrations increase complexity, making securing Active Directory a continuous, enterprise-wide effort.
• Lack of adherence to Active Directory security best practices: Many organizations still rely on manual oversight instead of enforcing Active Directory security best practices like least privilege, just-in-time access, and change approval workflows.
• Strategic oversight gap: CISOs often underestimate Active Directory drift, but poor Active Directory security governance directly translates to compliance failures, operational outages, and reputational harm.

What is the nature of small but dangerous Active Directory changes?

The following are reasons why small Active Directory changes can be dangerous:

1. Privilege escalation through unnoticed changes: Adding a temporary user to privileged groups like Domain Admins may seem operationally convenient, but it introduces critical Active Directory vulnerabilities that attackers can weaponize.
2. Weak password and account policies: Settings such as passwords never expiring or relaxed complexity rules erode efforts in securing Active Directory, giving adversaries easier entry points.
3. Risky GPO modifications: A single GPO misconfiguration can disable defenses or distribute malicious scripts, often triggering large-scale Active Directory attacks.
4. Service account mismanagement: Over-permissive delegation or weakly secured service accounts open the door for Kerberos abuse and persistence techniques within Active Directory.
5. Audit and logging disablement: Turning off or weakening Active Directory auditing blinds monitoring tools, masking ongoing Active Directory attacks and delaying incident response.
6. Privilege creep and shadow admins: Years of incremental changes lead to hidden, over-privileged accounts that silently expand the footprint of Active Directory vulnerabilities.

Why do these changes go unnoticed?

Here are some reasons why these changes go unnoticed:

• Operational convenience over security
  • IT teams often prioritize uptime and user productivity, approving quick fixes without assessing long-term risk.
  • For example, granting temporary admin rights and forgetting to revoke them.
• Lack of continuous monitoring
  • Most enterprises don’t have real-time visibility into Active Directory changes.
  • Without automated alerts, subtle modifications (like GPO tweaks or user privilege changes) get buried in event logs.
• Privilege creep and complexity
  • Large Active Directory environments have thousands of groups, policies, and trust relationships.
  • Over time, incremental changes accumulate, making it nearly impossible to track who has what level of access.
• Assumed trust in administrators
  • Changes made by domain admins are rarely scrutinized.
  • Attackers exploiting compromised admin accounts benefit from this trust gap.
• Insufficient governance
  • There is no formal review or approval process for Active Directory modifications.
  • Without IAM-driven workflows, changes go live without oversight or rollback mechanisms.
• Noise in event logs
  • Native Active Directory logs are massive and hard to parse.
  • Critical signals about dangerous changes get lost in routine operational noise.

How do attackers exploit these small changes?

Let's consider this scenario: An attacker gains an initial foothold into the network, leverages a small Active Directory misconfiguration (a temporary privilege assignment), then escalates, persists, moves laterally, and achieves large-scale impact, often while native Active Directory logging is blind or ignored.

Step 1: Initial foothold and discovery

Low-privilege compromise → Reconnaissance

What happens:

An attacker obtains a non-privileged account (through phishing, credential stuffing, or breach reuse) and uses it to scan Active Directory, identifying group memberships, service accounts, trusts, and GPOs. Any small privilege overlap or visible temporary change becomes a target.

Why initial access matters:

Even a seemingly harmless user account can unlock a wealth of insight. Through Active Directory’s inherent visibility, attackers can map relationships and spot configuration gaps. A single overlooked permission or exposed service account can transform basic access into an entry point for lateral movement.

Detection signals:

• Unusual logons (e.g., new locations, new devices, or odd times) or a sudden successful login after repeated failed attempts.
• Spikes in directory reads or abnormal LDAP/LDAPS queries and access to objects not previously touched (e.g., searching for the Domain Admins group)

Mitigation strategies:

• Enforce MFA and conditional access for remote or admin-adjacent accounts.
• Harden account policies (no permanent, never-expire service or privilege accounts).
• Monitor and throttle abnormal directory queries; restrict who can enumerate sensitive groups.

Step 2: Privilege escalation and persistence

Small AD change → Long-term control

What happens:

The attacker leverages a small AD change (e.g., a temporary group membership, a GPO that grants local admin rights, a password-never-expires account, or a weak Kerberos delegation) to escalate their privileges. Then, they persist with hidden accounts, scheduled tasks, or GPO-pushed local admin rights, or they disable or clear auditing.

Why this amplifies risk:

A single membership or policy relaxation converts a foothold into control over high-value identities and the ability to remain undetected.

Detection signals:

• Unexpected group membership changes into privileged groups or sudden changes to password or account policies
• New accounts or service principals created outside provisioning workflows
• Modifications to auditing or gaps in log timelines

Mitigation strategies:

• Require multi-party approval and change tickets for privilege changes; enforce just-in-time (JIT) privileged access and privileged access management (PAM) workflows.
• Protect and alert on logging or audit configuration edits; use automated orphan account discovery and access certification.
• Forward logs off-host or use immutable log aggregation so adversaries cannot erase traces.

Step 3: Lateral movement to domain compromise and impact

Use of stolen privileges → Destruction or exfiltration

What happens:

With privileged credentials or forged Kerberos tickets, the attacker moves laterally (using pass-the-hash, ticket abuse, or replication techniques) to domain controllers and critical servers, then disables controls, exfiltrates data, or deploys ransomware.

Why the domino fell:

Prior tiny misconfigurations (like shadow admins, GPO-pushed admin rights, or permissive delegation) made lateral movement trivial and rapid, amplifying impact enterprise-wide.

Detection signals:

• High volumes of authentications across many hosts using the same credentials
• Kerberos anomalies (unexpected authentication patterns) or privileged account use from endpoints that never hosted admin activity
• Mass file encryption, large external data transfers, or sudden changes to replication or trust settings

Mitigation strategies:

• Enforce admin tiering and restrict where privileged credentials may be used; require recorded PAM sessions for critical admin tasks.
• Monitor for anomalous authentication or ticket behavior, and block suspicious credential reuse.
• Execute incident response playbooks (e.g., isolate domain controllers, perform credential resets at scale, and conduct forensic review), use enterprise Active Directory backups or authoritative restore, and then remove shadow admins and rotate privileged credentials.

How unmonitored AD changes are a strategic risk for CISOs

The following are some strategic risks CISOs face when it comes to seemingly minor Active Directory changes:

• Regulatory and compliance exposure
  • Weak Active Directory controls directly violate frameworks like SOX, HIPAA, the PCI DSS, and the GDPR.
  • Impact: Organizations experience audit failures and incur fines and potential legal action.
• Financial fallout
  • Ransomware payouts, downtime costs, and breach remediation escalate quickly.
  • Impact: Organizations pay millions in direct costs plus suffer the loss of investor confidence.
• Operational disruption
  • A compromised Active Directory cripples day-to-day business operations (e.g., logins, access to apps, and collaboration tools).
  • Impact: Entire workforce productivity stalls, leading to cascading business losses.
• Reputational damage
  • Public disclosure of an Active-Directory-driven breach erodes customer and partner trust.
  • Impact: Organizations experience long-term brand damage and a competitive disadvantage.
• Board-level accountability
  • Active Directory security is increasingly seen as a business continuity issue, not just an IT risk.
  • Impact: CISOs must answer directly to boards on identity governance and resilience.

How do SIEM solutions help overcome the domino effect of Active Directory changes?

Here is how SIEM solutions can help combat this:

Enterprise marketing - Infographic - Domino effect AD security

Conclusion

Small changes in Active Directory may seem harmless, but they can trigger a domino effect that compromises the entire enterprise. For CISOs, the challenge lies in creating a strategy that combines people, processes, and the right tools for identifying and mitigating these risks before attackers exploit them. Proactive governance, continuous monitoring, and enforcement of security best practices are non-negotiable. SIEM and IAM solutions provide the visibility, automation, and controls needed to secure Active Directory at scale. By stopping small misconfigurations from snowballing into full-blown breaches, enterprises can safeguard both security and business continuity.

Related solutions