On this page
Companies today place enormous emphasis on protecting customer data, driven by high-profile breaches, stringent DPDP penalties, and immediate legal repercussions when consumer information is compromised. This customer-centric approach leads organizations to invest in dedicated compliance programs and advanced technical safeguards for client-facing systems, making privacy a visible business priority.
Conversely, employee data managed by HR—which is equally governed by the DPDP Act—is often overlooked. The sensitive personal information held within HR’s domain receives far less attention, with fewer controls, audits, and awareness initiatives compared to customer datasets. This disparity leaves HR functions vulnerable, as risks tied to staff data leakages, privilege misuse, and unmonitored workflows remain largely undetected and unmanaged—despite carrying similar regulatory and reputational consequences under the DPDP.
HR’s role in data privacy risk
HR functions as the organizational nexus for personal data collection, processing, and storage, including everything from pre-employment screenings to alumni engagement. These processes often involve sensitive identification documents, address and health records, family information, and more. Any oversight introduces a ticking compliance bomb under the DPDP.
- Payroll, onboarding, benefits, and performance management systems process vast personally identifiable information (PII) volumes daily.
- Third-party HR SaaS integrations, background screening vendors, and even recruitment apps each create their own data flows—often poorly mapped or minimally monitored.
Unlike IT or finance, HR is rarely a primary audience for security awareness, routine audits, or data flow mapping.
Why HR is a blind spot
The primary DPDP blind spot occurs because HR’s digital and manual processes span shadow IT, legacy records, email attachments, and multiple outsourced partners. Several key factors drive this:
- Siloed operations: HR routines are compartmentalized, typically outside core InfoSec oversight.
- Shadow IT: HR teams frequently onboard new SaaS tools (for wellness, feedback, or engagement) without formal security review, creating invisible data risk pockets.
- Legacy record handling: Paper records, outdated file shares, and manual workflows persist due to regulatory or business inertia—outside most monitoring frameworks.
- High turnover: Onboarding and offboarding lapses leave dormant user accounts and permissions, a classic residual risk.
DPDP Act: Unique HR compliance pressures
India’s DPDP Act places stringent obligations directly relevant to HR:
- Explicit and granular employee consent for data processing/transfer.
- Data minimization for each HR process: only collect/retain what’s operationally justified.
- Mandatory 72-hour breach notifications, including for incidents originating in HR-administered platforms.
- Rigorous vendor management: third-party contractors and background screening providers must meet DPDP standards.
- Cross-border transfer limitations and audit requirements for any global HR operations.
Unmonitored HR scenarios: Real compliance failures
Dormant credentials and former employee leakage
Habitual delays in deprovisioning access (after resignations or layoffs) create undetected back doors. Ex-employees, contractors, or vendors may continue to access HR and payroll systems, risking unauthorized data access post separation.
Shadow HR applications
Well-meaning HR managers may deploy SaaS candidate-tracking or survey tools without IT approval, bypassing DPDP-mandated risk reviews. Sensitive data in these platforms can be exported or exposed through weak access controls.
Forgotten shared storage
Recruitment files, reference checks, and payroll records often land on misconfigured network drives or cloud storage buckets, set to public by default or left inherited from old projects. These are a prime source of silent breaches.
Unrehearsed incident response
HR is rarely included in InfoSec tabletop exercises or data breach rehearsals—despite owning sensitive, highly regulated data. When incidents do happen, lag in response and confusion about responsibility delay breach notifications and deepen exposure.
Enterprise implications: More than regulatory fines
Ignoring the HR blind spot can lead to:
- Steep DPDP penalties for non-notification, poor consent management, or unchecked data retention.
- Erosion of employee trust and employer brand damage.
- Breach of union agreements or statutory employment protections, compounding risk.
Action steps to eliminate the HR blind spot
1. Data flow mapping for HR
Every data element HR collects must be mapped: from source to storage to deletion pathway. Identify all integrations, backup snapshots, and shared folders.
- Include shadow IT HR apps in discovery.
- Map both digital and physical (paper) data trails.
2. Proactive access review and offboarding
Regularly audit HR user privileges and automate deprovisioning across all in-scope systems. This closes the loop on privilege creep and orphan accounts.
- Use SIEM integrations to monitor suspicious HR system access.
- Include third-party HR contractors in access life cycle management.
3. HR-specific security awareness and training
Tailor privacy and security training to HR, emphasizing DPDP principles: minimal data collection, need-to-know sharing, consent requirements, and breach response.
- Test incident response readiness with HR-involved breach simulations.
- Make DPDP compliance part of HR KPIs.
4. Vendor/partner risk assessments
- Screen all HR vendors using robust data processing impact assessments.
- Mandate DPDP-aligned privacy and breach notification terms in contracts.
- Audit data flows with every onboarding of HR SaaS or business process outsourcing solutions.
5. Monitor and secure HR data at rest and in motion
- Deploy DLP tools and activity monitoring for HR systems, especially for:
- Mass downloads, bulk exports, or email forwarding of personal data.
- File-sharing tool usage in HR contexts.
- Automated detection of public cloud storage misconfigurations.
6. Incident response integration
- HR must be a listed stakeholder in data breach plans, with clear notification, escalation, and reporting duties.
- Practice cross-functional breach rehearsals including payroll, benefits, and recruitment teams.
- Document who triggers DPDP notifications if an HR system is compromised.
Example: HR blindness breeds breach
In 2024, a large retailer’s HR department continued using a legacy onboarding app after the vendor contract expired. The app was misconfigured on a public cloud, with access logs and PII still active. No one in HR "owned" the offboarding, so years of employee data remained open to brute-force attacks until discovered by a security researcher. The incident led to regulatory inquiry under multiple data protection laws—the DPDP and international equivalents. Steep fines and a months-long PR crisis followed.
Turning the HR blind spot into a DPDP stronghold
Organizations must treat HR as a high-risk processing environment, not a compliance afterthought. Practical steps include:
- Assigning a dedicated data protection officer contact within or closely aligned to the HR function.
- Running quarterly audits of HR-held data assets, both digital and physical.
- Creating HR-specific playbooks for consent, breach, and data requests.
Related solutions
ManageEngine AD360 is a unified IAM solution securing digital identities with adaptive MFA and role-based access control. It prevents insider threats, while ensuring compliance and minimizing unauthorized access risks.
To learn more,
Sign up for a personalized demoManageEngine Log360 is a unified SIEM platform combining UEBA, DLP, CASB, and SOAR to detect threats, protect networks, monitor the dark web, and automate responses. It enables faster incident resolution, reducing breach impact and compliance risks.
To learn more,
Sign up for a personalized demoThis content has been reviewed and approved by Ram Vaidyanathan, IT security and technology consultant at ManageEngine.